1. Learn
    2. EQ and filters
    3. Linear vs minimum phase

    Linear phase vs minimum phase EQ

    Both draw the same EQ curve. A minimum phase EQ has no latency but shifts the frequencies it changes slightly out of step with the rest. A linear phase EQ keeps every frequency in step, at the cost of latency, CPU and faint ringing before sharp hits. Use minimum phase unless copies of a sound get blended.

    The curve
    Identical in both modes
    Minimum phase costs
    A timing shift around each change
    Linear phase costs
    Latency, CPU and pre-ringing
    Default choice
    Minimum phase, unless copies get blended
    LP·1Linear phase EQ lab
    Phase
    Band
    One click through the EQMinimum phaseLinear phase
    All the ringing sits after the dashed line
    Curve and delayEQ curveMinLin
    The loudest hitOriginalAfter EQ

    Right now

    Minimum phase, a 24 dB per octave low cut at 100 Hz: nothing comes out before the sound. On the click screen all the ringing follows the dashed line and lasts 8.4 ms. The cost is phase shift: around 87 Hz the sound comes out 6.2 ms later than the rest, which is the bend in the delay lane.
    0ms latency
    0ms rings early
    6.2ms shift at 87 Hz
    Freq100 Hz
    Gain0.0 dB
    Q1.00
    Slope24 dB/oct
    Length8192 taps
    Mix100%

    Follow the steps. Each one sets the controls for you and tells you what to listen for.

    Step 1 of 8
    A low cut in minimum phasePress play. This is a 24 dB per octave low cut at 100 Hz on a normal, minimum phase EQ. On the click screen all the ringing comes after the dashed line, and there's no latency. The delay lane bends down around the cutoff: the drums near 87 Hz come out 6.2 ms later than everything else.
    Train your earsEach round plays the sound through a strong low cut or a narrow bass boost, in minimum phase or linear phase, and you say which. The screens are covered. Listen to the moment just before each kick.

    Loop from Wonky Percussion, a Sounds Like You pack.

    The short answer

    Use minimum phase for almost everything. It has no latency and nothing rings before the sound, and on a single track its timing shift is very hard to hear. Switch to linear phase when the EQ'd sound is going to be added to another copy of itself: parallel EQ, mid/side EQ, one microphone out of several on the same source, or a crossover that splits a sound into bands and joins them again.

    On a master, either is fine for gentle moves. Steep cuts and narrow boosts in the bass are where linear phase goes wrong, because they put a soft swell in front of every kick.

    At a glance

    Minimum phase and linear phase EQ compared
    PropertyMinimum phaseLinear phase
    EQ curveThe one you drawThe same one
    TimingFrequencies near each change come out a little early or lateEvery frequency comes out late by the same amount
    RingingAll of it after the soundHalf before the sound, half after
    LatencyNoneHalf the filter length, usually tens of milliseconds
    CPULightHeavier, more so at high resolution
    Blended with a dry copyPartly cancels around each changeAdds up cleanly
    Behaves likeAn analogue EQNothing analogue
    Best forSingle tracks, drums, bass, recordingParallel, mid/side and multi-mic EQ, gentle mastering

    What's the difference between linear phase and minimum phase EQ?

    An EQ curve tells you how much each frequency gets turned up or down. It says nothing about when each frequency comes out, and the same curve can be built in more than one way that answers that question differently. Minimum phase and linear phase are the two common answers, and they're all that changes when you flip the phase mode on an EQ such as FabFilter Pro-Q.

    A minimum phase EQ behaves like an analogue circuit. Its filters work on each sample as it arrives, feeding a little of their own output back into themselves, so there's no latency. The side effect is that the frequencies around each change fall slightly out of step with the rest, mostly later and sometimes a touch earlier. That timing change is called phase shift, and it's why the mode has the name it does: of all the filters that could draw a given curve, this kind has the least delay.

    A linear phase EQ uses one long filter whose response to a click is the same forwards as backwards. Every frequency comes out late by exactly the same amount, so nothing in the sound moves against anything else, and your DAW lines the whole track back up with the others. Plot phase against frequency for such a filter and you get a straight line, hence linear.

    The first two steps of the lab put a 24 dB per octave low cut at 100 Hz on the drums in each mode. In minimum phase the lane under the curve bends around the cutoff, with the drums near 87 Hz coming out 6.2 ms late. In linear phase the lane is flat and the whole sound is 92.9 ms late, while the ringing on the click screen spreads to both sides of the dashed line.

    Reading the lab

    The big screen sends one click through the EQ and draws what comes out, which is the filter's impulse response. Anything left of the dashed line came out before the sound that caused it. The bright shape is the mode you're hearing and the thin line is the other, so both are always on screen. Under it, the pink line is the curve measured from that click and the lane below shows how late each frequency comes out. The close-up screen next to it shows the loudest hit in the loop, with the 30 ms in front of it shaded, since that's where pre-ringing shows up. The Minimum phase and Linear phase buttons swap modes without touching the curve, so they're the switch to flip while you listen.

    What does minimum phase EQ cost?

    Its one cost is the phase shift, which collects around each change in the curve and grows when the change is steeper, bigger, narrower or lower in frequency. Here are the largest shifts the lab measures.

    Largest timing shift in minimum phase, measured in the lab
    EQ moveLargest shiftAround
    Bell, −3 dB at 400 Hz, Q 0.80.2 ms371 Hz
    High cut, 2.5 kHz, 24 dB/oct0.3 ms2.2 kHz
    Low cut, 250 Hz, 48 dB/oct5.9 ms240 Hz
    Low cut, 100 Hz, 24 dB/oct6.2 ms87 Hz
    Low cut, 40 Hz, 48 dB/oct37.0 ms39 Hz

    Low frequencies get the longest delays because their cycles are the longest; one cycle at 40 Hz lasts 25 ms. Even so, on a single sound you'll rarely hear any of it. The delayed frequencies are mostly the ones the EQ is already turning down, and your ears are far less fussy about timing between the frequencies inside one sound than about timing between two separate sounds. A minimum phase EQ rings too, but all of that ringing follows the sound, and a loud sound hides quieter ones that come straight after it.

    The shift becomes a real problem when the EQ'd sound meets another copy of itself. Two copies that are out of step at some frequency partly cancel there, which is the same effect as a comb filter. Step 7 blends a 24 dB per octave high cut at 2.5 kHz half and half with the dry vocal. A clean blend would leave the top end a few decibels down, but at the cutoff the minimum phase copy is half a cycle behind the dry one, so the result dips 16.3 dB below where it should be, around 2.4 kHz.

    What does linear phase EQ cost?

    Latency

    A linear phase filter is centred on the moment the sound arrives, so its first half has to play before that moment, and the only way to manage that is to hold the whole signal back by half the filter's length. The lab's filter is 8192 samples long. That puts everything 4096 samples late, which is 92.9 ms at 44.1 kHz. On playback your DAW's delay compensation hides it by holding back every other track to match, but while you're recording, or playing a synth through that channel, you'll hear each note late. The linear phase EQ lesson lists the latency for each common filter length.

    Pre-ringing

    Every sharp EQ change rings, and a linear phase EQ has to share that ringing evenly on both sides of the sound, so half of it plays before each hit. A loud sound covers quieter ones for a good while after it but only very briefly before it. Ringing in front of a kick therefore sits in the quiet gap, with nothing to hide behind, and you hear it as a soft swell or a smear leading into the transient.

    Whether that's audible depends on where the ringing lands. The 100 Hz cut from step 2 rings 6.9 ms early on the click, but this loop has little energy there, so the 30 ms in front of the loudest kick stays 53 dB below the hit, the same as with no EQ. Step 3 moves the cut to 250 Hz at 48 dB per octave, into the body of the kick, and that gap rises to 35 dB below the hit, 18 dB louder than before. Step 4 switches the same cut back to minimum phase, and the front of the kick is clean again. You pay for it with 5.9 ms of shift around 240 Hz, which arrives after the hit, where it's covered.

    CPU and low-end accuracy

    Linear phase uses more processing, because one filter thousands of samples long is more work than the few small filters a minimum phase band needs. One on a master is nothing; one on every track of a big session adds up.

    A filter of fixed length also runs out of room at very low frequencies, since it can't shape a frequency that only fits a few cycles inside it. Pick Bass in the lab, set a 48 dB per octave low cut at 40 Hz in linear phase, and the 8192-tap filter misses its curve by 5.8 dB at 29 Hz. Turn the Length knob up to 16384 taps and the miss shrinks to 2.6 dB, but the latency doubles to 185.8 ms. That's the trade the resolution or quality setting on a linear phase EQ makes for you.

    When do the two sound the same?

    Most of the time. Gentle, broad moves ring so little that the modes are close to identical. Steps 5 and 6 put a 3 dB cut at 400 Hz with a Q of 0.8 on the full loop. In minimum phase the biggest timing shift is 0.2 ms; in linear phase the click rings 1.2 ms early, 38 dB below the peak. Flip between the buttons with the loop running and listen for any change.

    A 12 dB per octave high cut at 8 kHz on the same loop is gentler still, and the lab can't time any ringing for it in either mode. Most EQ work in a mix is made of moves like that, small amounts on wide bells and soft slopes. The phase mode starts to matter with steep filter slopes, narrow boosts, big gains and low frequencies, or when copies of a sound get blended.

    Blending copies: where linear phase wins

    Step 8 plays the vocal blend from step 7 in linear phase. Both copies share the same 92.9 ms delay, so they stay lined up and the result lands on the clean blend the mix knob asked for, with the 16.3 dB dip gone. Any time the EQ'd signal is added to another version of itself, this is the difference you're choosing between.

    • Parallel EQ, through a mix knob set below 100% or a filtered copy on its own bus.
    • Mid/side EQ, where the mid (what both channels share) and the side (the difference between them) get different moves. If the halves are shifted differently, they recombine slightly wrong and the stereo image moves around the frequencies you changed.
    • One microphone of several on the same source, such as a close snare mic EQ'd against overheads that also hear the snare. The drum phase alignment lesson covers why those mics have to stay in step.
    • Crossovers, where a multiband compressor splits a sound into bands and then adds them back together.

    The same rule clears up a common worry. Two copies that go through the same minimum phase EQ shift together, so they stay in step with each other. The left and right channels of a stereo track with one EQ on it are fine, and so is a whole drum bus through one EQ. Trouble only starts when one copy is EQ'd and the other isn't, or the two are EQ'd differently.

    Which phase mode for which job

    Choosing a phase mode
    JobMinimum phaseLinear phase
    Low cut on a kick, bass or drum loopBest choiceRings before hits if the cut is steep
    Tone shaping on one vocal or synthBest choiceWorks, with latency for no gain
    Parallel EQDips around each changeBest choice
    Mid/side EQCan move the stereo imageBest choice
    Close mic against overheadsCan change how the mics sumBest choice
    Gentle, broad moves on a masterFineFine, and a common choice
    Steep low cut on a masterSaferCan smear every kick
    Recording or playing through the channelBest choiceToo much latency
    EQ on every track of a big sessionBest choiceHeavy on CPU and latency

    How to choose between them, step by step

    1. Start in minimum phaseIt's the default on nearly every EQ, including Ableton's EQ Eight, which has no linear phase mode at all.
    2. Ask whether the sound gets blendedIf the EQ'd signal will be added to another copy of itself, through a mix knob, a parallel bus, mid/side processing or another microphone, switch to linear phase.
    3. Check the low endIn linear phase, look for steep cuts or narrow boosts in the bass on anything with sharp hits. Solo the track and listen to the moment just before each kick. If it swells, soften the slope, widen the band or go back to minimum phase.
    4. Keep it off the inputIf you're recording or playing through the channel, use minimum phase or bypass the EQ until the take is done.
    5. Compare both modes and keep the cheaper oneFlip between them a few times while the track plays. If you can't hear a difference, keep minimum phase, since it costs nothing.

    How to hear the difference with a null test

    The lab plays one loop, but you can measure your own tracks in your DAW. Because the two modes draw the same curve, anything left over when you cancel one against the other is the difference in timing and nothing else.

    1. Duplicate the trackMake sure your DAW's delay compensation is on, which it is by default in most.
    2. Put the same EQ on both copiesUse the same plug-in and the same curve, minimum phase on one copy and linear phase on the other.
    3. Flip the polarity of one copyUse a utility plug-in or the channel's phase invert button, then play both at the same fader level.
    4. Listen to what's leftFor a gentle move it'll be close to silence. For a steep cut you'll hear a short burst near the cutoff frequency around each hit, which is the timing difference made audible.

    Remember that the leftover is played on its own, with nothing to hide it. Something you can hear clearly in a null test can still be impossible to pick out in the mix, so treat it as a guide to where the modes differ and make the decision by ear on the real track.

    Is there a mode in between?

    Some EQs have one. FabFilter Pro-Q offers Natural Phase alongside its zero latency and linear phase modes; it aims to match the phase behaviour of an analogue EQ, with some latency but less than its linear phase settings need. Treat a mode like this as a minimum phase EQ for the questions on this page: it still shifts the frequencies around each change, so it won't blend cleanly with a dry copy the way linear phase does.

    Common mistakes

    Choosing linear phase because it sounds more accurate

    The tone change is the same in both modes. Linear phase makes a different trade with timing, swapping a shift after each change for latency and ringing before it, and on a single track that trade is often impossible to hear. Choose it for a reason, like a blend, and judge it by ear.

    Steep linear phase cuts on drums and bass

    A 48 dB per octave low cut high enough to touch the body of a kick puts a swell in front of every hit, as step 3 shows. On drums and bass, a minimum phase cut is the safer choice, or a gentler slope if you need to stay in linear phase.

    Mixing modes across copies

    If you EQ a parallel bus or a close mic with a minimum phase EQ and leave the other copy dry, the cancellation from step 7 happens in your mix. Either use linear phase on the EQ'd copy or keep its moves gentle.

    Tracking through a linear phase EQ

    With tens of milliseconds of latency, often far more, a singer or player hears themselves late and the take suffers. Switch the EQ to minimum phase or bypass it while recording.

    The curves themselves, and how to set them, are covered in the EQ lesson, and the phase lesson explains why two copies that are slightly out of step cancel.

    Training your ears to tell them apart

    The quiz under the lab plays the loop through a strong low cut or a narrow bass boost, in one mode or the other, with the screens covered, and asks which you heard. Linear phase gives itself away with a swell in the gap in front of each kick; minimum phase leaves the front clean and lets the low end hang on a touch longer after the hit. Your best score is saved in your browser.

    Questions people ask

    Which is better, linear phase or minimum phase EQ?

    Neither, across the board. Both draw the same curve and change the tone by the same amount. Minimum phase has no latency and no pre-ringing, so it's the better default. Linear phase is the better choice when the EQ'd sound gets added to another copy of itself, as in parallel EQ, mid/side EQ or a multi-mic recording.

    Can you hear the difference between linear and minimum phase EQ?

    With gentle, broad moves on a single track, very rarely. The difference grows with steep slopes, narrow boosts, big gains and low frequencies, where linear phase can put a swell in front of each drum hit. It's easiest to hear when the EQ'd sound is blended with a dry copy, because minimum phase makes the two copies cancel around the change.

    Is analogue EQ minimum phase?

    Yes. Ordinary analogue EQ circuits behave as minimum phase filters, so a minimum phase plug-in shifts phase in the same way a hardware EQ does. Linear phase EQ needs the signal held back and then processed with a long digital filter, so it only exists in digital processing, almost always as a plug-in.

    Should I use linear phase EQ for mastering?

    It's a common choice for gentle moves on a master, such as a wide cut in the low mids or a small high shelf, because it changes the tone without changing the timing of anything in the mix. Avoid steep linear phase low cuts on a master, since they act on the kick and bass together and can smear the front of every kick. Compare both modes and keep the one you can't hear a problem with.

    Why does my kick sound soft after a linear phase EQ?

    That's usually pre-ringing. A steep cut or a narrow boost in the low end rings, and in linear phase half of that ringing plays before each hit, which blurs the start of the kick. Make the slope gentler, widen the bell, or switch that band to minimum phase.

    Does minimum phase EQ cause phase problems between different tracks?

    Not between different instruments. A kick and a bass aren't copies of each other, so a few milliseconds of shift on one can't make them cancel the way two copies would. Phase shift only causes trouble when the same sound reaches the mix twice, through two microphones, a parallel bus or mid/side processing, and the copies are EQ'd differently.

    Keep going

    Zac Dobos

    Zac runs Sounds Like You, which makes sample packs, preset packs and the Murmur granular synth plug-in. The lessons in Learn are free, and every one has a working version of the effect in it.